Sources of
Sprawl in Florida's New Urbanized Areas
Results from the Holdren method (and in parentheses the simple ratio
method)*
|
Urbanized
Area
|
%
of Total Sprawl
related to
GROWTH IN
PER CAPITA LAND CONSUMPTION was:
|
%
of Total Sprawl
related to POPULATIONGROWTH
was:
|
|
Daytona
Beach
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Fort Myers-Cape
Coral
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Fort Pierce
|
(1%) 2%
|
98% (99%)
|
|
Fort Walton
Beach
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Lakeland
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Melbourne-Palm
Bay
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Naples
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Ocala
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Panama
City
|
(1%) 1%
|
99% (99%)
|
|
Sarasota-Bradenton
|
(0%) 0%
|
100% (100%)
|
|
Winter
Haven
|
(0%) 0%
|
100%
(100%)
|
|
Mean
of percentages
|
(0.2%)
0.3%
|
99.7%
(99.8%)
|
|
Weighted
average**
|
(0%)
0%
|
100%
(100%)
|
*Holdren
method explained in Appendix D. Simple ratio method described in
Section 5.1.
Read
the Full Report
|
